American Printer's mission is to be the most reliable and authoritative source of information on integrating tomorrow's technology with today's management.

Jan 1, 2007 12:00 AM
AMERICAN QUICK PRINTER
Many sprawling plants trace their roots to a single small-format press. We’ve all heard inspirational tales of Chiefs and Multis clattering away in basements and even some entrepreneurs’ bedrooms. But today, small-format presses face considerable competition from evolving toner-based equipment, as well as increasingly efficient larger format presses. What next for these workhorses? Here are some insights from Hamada (Yorba Linda, CA), Heidelberg (Kennesaw, GA), KBA (Burlington, VT), Komori (Rolling Meadows, IL), Presstek (Hudson, NH), Ryobi/xpedx (Lenexa, KS), Sakurai (Schaumberg, IL) and Screen USA (Rolling Meadows, IL).
Overflow, shorter run lengths and other issues
Komori product manager Doug Schardt says the migration of volume
from small offset presses to digital platforms has been
overestimated. Nonetheless, he concedes commodity work is waning.
“If a printer had been depending on it,” says Schardt,
“that printer had better have something else to
do.”
Presstek’s business development manager Tom Leibrandt cites a
“marked rise” in demand for multicolor, short-run work,
both DI and conventional.
Declining run lengths, says Don Harvey, vice president and GM,
xpedx Ryobi division, create “substantial
opportunities” to produce jobs in the 500- to 5,000-copy
range on small-format offset equipment—in which Ryobi claims
to be the “share leader.”
Fred Kirpec, service manager for Sakurai, reports seeing an
increase in gang runs on the company’s 58 series presses,
which can handle four-up 81?2 x 11-inch work that often represents
overflow from larger presses.
Mike Dighton, vice president of marketing and customer service for
Hamada, says large press overflow is a perfect fit for the B452
Mark II, a sophisticated 20-inch press that can run postcards,
brochures and POP material.
KBA North America president of marketing Eric Frank adds that the best way to counter commoditization in the 20-inch market is with equipment that can, like the Genius 52 UV, perform longer runs with heavier solids and better quality on a wider range of substrates. When a small press can do that, he says, it becomes “more of a value-added product than a price-per-piece product.” It’s vital for small-format printers to offer high quality, he adds, because, “You’re not going to make a profit by competing with the DocuColor at Staples.”
Big printers need small presses, too
Small-format presses aren’t just for small printers. Dighton
observes that runs of 200 to 1,000 can be cost-prohibitive on a
40-inch press because the plating expense is high relative to the
quantity produced. A 20-inch press comes in handy for that work,
which printers are seeing more frequently as print buyers
increasingly avoid inventorying large amounts of product. Schardt
agrees that midsize and large plants are a viable market for small
presses, which he says are never more appreciated than at the
moment when a good customer brings in a very-short-run job that
won’t run economically on the plant’s full-size
equipment.
Mark Crawford, Screen USA’s product manager, output
solutions, agrees: “A 40-inch shop might be helping out its
customer base by running small jobs, even though they can’t
make money producing those jobs on their large-format presses. Our
Truepress 344 lets them [handle those jobs more
efficiently].”
Tim Kirby, xpedx printing technologies national sales manager, says
printers of all sizes are buying 14 x 20-inch presses on a regular
basis because it’s the smallest press that can print with
quality comparable to 40-inch equipment.
Heidelberg’s director of product management for commercial
print, Joerg Daehnhardt, says that while small shops and
entry-level four-color businesses are among the major markets for
its small-format presses, other users include shops with solid
experience in four- and five-color printing, including CIP4 and
color management; commercial printers offering inline coating; and
plants with specialty applications.
Unlike a large-format press, which may replace two or even three
older presses, the replacement ratio is less dramatic on the
small-format side. Schardt explains that because a vintage 20-inch
press is simple to run, a good operator can print very efficiently
with it. He pegs the replacement factor closer to “a press
and a half” than two or three.
Daehnhardt agrees that the benefit depends on what is being
replaced. If a printer upgrades from a duplicator with a T-head,
then the ratio could be 1:2. But he adds that when most printers
invest in new small-format presses, they’re typically seeking
better quality and job flexibility rather than just more capacity.
Features such as zoneless inking, perfecting, coating and inline
die cutting—all available on the Speedmaster SM 52—are
what really add value in small-format equipment, says
Daehnhardt.
All kinds of automation
Harvey says Ryobi offers extensive automation across all sizes of
its press offerings. Ryobi’s 14 x 20-inch presses can
makeready in six to eight minutes and handle 81?2 x 11-inch and 11
x 17-inch work at 15,000 sph as productively as 28- and 29-inch
presses. Dighton notes that Hamada’s B452 Mark II features
automatic plate loading, blanket washing, running register control,
stream feeding and CIP3 ink fountain setting: “Everything
that a 40-inch press has—we just shrunk it down to a 20-inch
press.”
There is, however, a practical limit to small-press automation. As Daehnhardt puts it: “When was the last time you saw a small-format press running at 18,000 sph?” Noting that a 20-inch sheet isn’t nearly as challenging to control as a 40-inch one, he explains some features that are essential for larger presses are neither feasible nor cost-effective for smaller formats. An “adapted level of automation” is Heidelberg’s goal.
Heidelberg cites the small commercial market segment as among its top priorities—the vendor recently launched a special Web site, Printers Advantage (www.printers advantage.com), which targets this group. The site includes information on Printmaster QM 46, Printmaster 52, Printmaster GTO 52 and Speedmaster SM 52, along with other small-format equipment. Membership is free, and printers need not own a Heidelberg press to register.
How low can they go?
Comparing a small offset press to a digital one is a tricky
proposition. The cost of digital clicks never changes, whereas in
an offset run, spreading makeready and other fixed costs over an
increasing number of copies drives the unit cost down. Cost-wise,
digital beats offset hands-down in very small quantities; but at
some point beyond that, offset becomes the better deal. The more
automated and efficient a small press is, the lower that crucial
crossover point can be.
(Editor’s note: Steve Johnson’s column on pg. 47 offers additional insights on digital print expenses.)
Many variables apply, but most vendors agree the low end of the
offset scale is somewhere between 200 and 250 four-color
impressions. Leibrandt says many Presstek DI customers can print
competitively at 250 sheets. He claims it takes only about
“$40 worth of material and 10 minutes of time” to start
up a DI press. Dighton, Schardt, Kirby and Kirpec say 200 is
possible with Hamada, Komori, Ryobi and Sakurai small presses,
respectively.
According to Frank, printing on the KBA Genius 52 UV could be
cost-justifiable for as few as 20 sheets. Daehnhardt says a
Heidelberg’s Speedmaster SM 52 equipped with the
vendor’s new Anicolor anilox inking and dampening technology
can come up to color in 20 sheets after only seven minutes of
makeready.
But sometimes convenience trumps price. As Schardt observes, if the clock is ticking, a digital press is clicking. How quickly does the customer need the job? If it’s a case of interrupting work already in production to make room for a higher-priority job, digital equipment might have the edge. So, hitting the exact crossover point isn’t always the main consideration.
Can they outdistance digital?
Daehnhardt acknowledges a digital press is the obvious choice if
the printer wants a variable-data printing (VDP) platform and has
an infrastructure for producing it in place—but this, he
contends, is seldom the situation. If the bulk of the
printer’s revenue comes from static, short-run work,
Daehnhardt says the best investment probably would be a combination
of a midrange digital press and an offset press to handle
everything over 500 copies.
Harvey adds that if the variable content is mostly text, a printer
might opt for a lower-end digital copier or even mailing equipment
that can process variable content.
Small-format presses fight on
Schardt says printers also must consider the complexity of typical
jobs and the extent to which the work involves varnishes, coatings,
and other enhancements beyond the scope of digital equipment.
Kirpec, likewise, notes that most shops these days handle a
“huge variety” of jobs, and digital won’t be the
answer for all of them. Offset, he says, still makes it possible to
offer a “well rounded” printing capability that digital
systems often can’t. Despite challenges from many worthy
competitors, small-format offset printing is alive and kicking.
Digital printing packs a punch
Print Industries Market Information and Research Organization
(PRIMIR) recently completed “Small Commercial and Quick
Printer Study 2006-2011.” According to PRIMIR: “The
kind of work that had traditionally been the specialty of the small
commercial and quick printer—relatively straightforward, one-
or two-color, small format, quick turnaround, short run—is
increasingly being produced at the desktop, workgroup, or central
reproduction department (CRD) level by toner and, more recently,
inkjet printers. It is no wonder that two-thirds of respondents see
this as a direct threat to their business.”
The likely effect on equipment purchasing decisions within the
segment, according to the study, is that: “Fewer sites intend
to invest in conventional offset presses. For those who do, one-
and two-color offset portrait type presses remain favored. Demand
for four-color printing is growing, and so is the interest among
small commercial and quick printers in buying four-color output
devices. This need is most likely to be met with the purchase of a
digital output device (color copier/printer or digital press) or DI
press, rather than a conventional four-color offset
press.”
How small is small format?
NPES small press designations include “SF Lith Press 23
inches and Under (includes 23 inches)—(two-page and
Under).” A subcategory, “Small Offset Presses and
Duplicators 19 inches and Below” comprises small presses
without stream feeders, registration devices and other advanced
features. A variety of sizes are offered, but the 52-cm (14 x
20-inch) format prevails. Some larger presses don’t quite fit
these sheet classifications but often are used for the same
applications as “true” small-format presses. Examples
include Komori’s 20 x 26-inch Spica 26 and Sakurai’s 18
1?8 x 22 3/4-inch 58
series.
Some small presses are a good fit for printers of all sizes, but a
few are better suited to midsize and large operations. KBA, for
example, reports that midsize and large plants, plastic printers,
package printers and specialty printers are buying its Genius 52
UV, while Heidelberg’s high-end Speedmaster SM 52 targets a
different market than its workhorse Printmaster QM 46 or
Printmaster PM 52.
The direct imaging question
The PRIMIR small commercial/quick print market study identifies DI
printing as a preferred solution for short runs in color, and DI
presses, with their built-in digital plating capability, would
appear to possess a technical edge. Eric Frank, who markets a
74-format DI press for KBA, says that the things that make a DI
press more productive vs. a non-DI press are its faster register,
more accurate color output, and reduced waste. Waterless printing
with a DI press is, says Frank, a stable, more streamlined form of
production that takes variables out of the process.
Watch that clock
Leibrandt casts a skeptical eye on tales of 10-minute makereadies
on conventional offset presses, contending these claims overlook
offline platemaking time and costs. With a DI press, says
Leibrandt, the 10 minutes of makeready are measured when the press
goes into operation: “from the RIP to the first salable
print.” In conventional printing, he argues, makeready
doesn’t start until the plates are made and on the press, and
it doesn’t include the time spent imaging and otherwise
preparing them.
According to Kirby, Ryobi sells its small-format 3404 DI “to
those who want the technology”—shops that need the
platemaking to be self-contained because of space constraints, or
those that are “digitally oriented” and like having a
DI press in their stable. However, he says, “Only in very
rare instances is a DI press going to ROI out faster or better than
a 14 x 20-inch press.”
Crawford says Screen’s DI offering, the Truepress 344, is a
good fit for in-plant and other operations transitioning from
duplicators to “real” presses, as well as book
printers’ cover printing needs and 40-inch shops seeking
high-quality small-format capabilities. Because the Truepress is a
wet offset press, he says, it could be used to produce proofs jobs
destined for a 40-inch press, particularly for die-hard customers
who balk at inkjet proofs.
Heidelberg stopped producing its Quickmaster DI 46-4 in 2006
(although it continues to resell used, reconditioned models).
Daehnhardt says that while DI remains a good way to break into
four-color production, improvements in offline CTP and prepress
workflows have caught up with direct-imaging presses. When a
shop’s workload exceeds five makereadies per day, he says, a
conventional press supported by a CTP device becomes very
competitive with a DI press.
Screen to host DI press event
Screen USA showcased its Truepress 344 DI press (pictured) at Graph
Expo and will host a special 344 event at its Rolling Meadows, IL,
facility February 5-7, 2007.
“We’ll demonstrate the press doing five- and six-color
work,” says Mark Crawford, product manager, output solutions.
“A third-party manufacturer will show an inline coater and
we’ll run a wide range of stocks, foils and so on.”
Screen also will highlight the Trueflow Rite TP workflow management
system.
Crawford says quality is a key point of differentiation for the
Truepress DI. “It’s a not a waterless press,” he
explains. “The Truepress 344 runs off-the-shelf inks and the
same blankets as a 40-inch press. The dot structure is the same.
Other than creating plates on press, the Truepress prints
identically to a 40-inch press.”
The four-color Truepress 344 has a maximum sheet size of 13.4 ×
18.5 inches and a maximum imaging area of 13 × 18.1 inches, with a
top printing speed of 7,000 sph. It utilizes high-speed 830-nm,
multi-array laser diode (MALD) imaging technology to expose
processless plates. Plates can be imaged at 2,400-dpi resolution
using screen rulings up to 175 lpi. In addition, Spekta screening
enables printers to enjoy the benefits of AM/FM hybrid screening.
In just over five minutes, the press is ready to start the next
job.
Launched at Ipex in 2006, the Truepress now is in full release with
approximately 35 installations worldwide, including two in the
United States. See www.screenusa.com.
Patrick Henry is the director of Liberty or Death Communications. Contact him via www.libordeath.com.