American Printer's mission is to be the most reliable and authoritative source of information on integrating tomorrow's technology with today's management.

Dec 1, 2006 12:00 AM
Postpress
Phil Sutton often suffered from a major pain in the neck, but it
didn’t come from sleeping on too soft a pillow. It
wasn’t his managers or colleagues, either; his employer,
Cedar Graphics, Inc., has been a five-time winner of the Master
Printers of America’s “Best Workplaces in
America.”
Sutton’s pain was due to static electricity that caused a
host of production problems in his company’s pressroom and
bindery areas.
Static screw-ups
One of the Midwest’s largest sheetfed printers with 130
employees, Hiawatha, IA-based Cedar Graphics prides itself on
providing high levels of service, quality and value to its
customers. Cedar Graphics prints a wide range of projects ranging
from advertising flyers to college recruitment materials,
calendars, catalogs and annual reports.
As pressroom manager, Sutton battled with static electricity that
jammed his six presses 30 to 40 times a day, interrupting
production workflow, reducing throughput, wasting paper and causing
expensive downtime. “That sort of waste and downtime
isn’t the way we do things,” Sutton says. Especially
frustrating was the fact the problems were both seasonal (mostly
during colder months) and sporadic.
Static cling caused double-sheeting of papers and paperboard, which
wasted paper, jammed presses and stopped work for cleanup. Problems
were most severe in the bindery and finishing areas, where
operations sometimes slowed to less than one-third their normal
rate. Static cling also caused uneven jogging, making it virtually
impossible to get a consistent edge.
Humidity hang-ups
Although static electricity was the most severe problem dogging
Sutton, it was far from the only one. Dimensional stability was
another pain in the neck when low relative humidity (RH) in the
warehouse and on the shop floor caused paper to shrink, warp and
wrinkle. Sometimes there were feeding problems and more press
stops. There were registration problems, both in printing and die
cutting. And too-dry paper frequently cracked or broke during
scoring, folding and cutting, releasing dust into the air and
contributing more stock to the waste stream.
Cedar Graphics’ problems weren’t unique. Similar
production problems caused by dry air are common in many parts of
the country where temperatures drop sharply in fall and winter, and
heating systems are kept busy 24/7 providing warm air to keep
employees comfortable.
Heating air dries it out, and RH often drops to troublesome levels,
sometimes to less than 10 percent. Troubles typically kick in when
RH drops to less than 30 percent. Ideal humidity for printing and
finishing ranges from 45 percent to 55 percent RH at 70°F.
Despite its dry air problems, Cedar Graphics had better humidity
control than many printing plants. A previously installed electric
steam humidification system provided a small measure of control. RH
levels sometimes dropped into the low 20s. According to Sutton, the
system’s capacity was inadequate for the job.
“The way our steam humidifiers delivered moisture was
inconsistent,” Sutton says. “Some areas were too dry,
while nearby areas were too wet. Our bindery manager refused to use
the system most of the time because excess water droplets were
rusting equipment and drips were ruining stock.”
To make things worse, energy costs for electricity were very high
and the steam system required constant, expensive service.
According to Sutton, “Our area’s water quality is poor,
with high lime content. We couldn’t use reverse osmosis (RO)
water with our system, so sludge and hard lime built up quickly in
the nozzles and steam heads.”
After analyzing and researching the issues, Sutton determined that
solving his static electricity and dimensional stability problems
would require more consistent humidity control at a much higher RH
range (45 percent to 50 percent).
Meet ML
Sutton’s research convinced him that a high-pressure
humidification system would provide increased capacity and greater
consistency. He also learned that a high-pressure system would
require far less maintenance and would sharply reduce energy
costs.
“High-pressure is inherently more energy-efficient,”
Sutton says, “because it generates cool mist. Using
electricity to heat water into steam is inherently inefficient and
typically the most expensive way to put moisture into the air.
Steam systems also generate more maintenance, because evaporating
water at high temperatures leaves more deposits in nozzles and
steam cores.”
At Graph Expo, Sutton met Pierre Husson of Husson Inc., exclusive
North American distributor for ML System, a Danish-based world
leader in high-pressure humidification that offers a wide range of
models for different problems.
After reviewing a number of high-pressure systems, Sutton
reduced the field to two companies. “All the high-pressure
systems had significantly lower energy costs and required less time
and money for maintenance,” he says, “but not all were
equal in the amount of energy and maintenance savings. There were
large differences in installation costs and the cost and
convenience of adding to or reconfiguring the system.”
Sutton’s decision to select an engineered system from ML
System was based on several factors:
Hasta la vista, static and humidity
Husson installed a new, engineered ML system in Cedar
Graphics’ 60,000-sq.-ft. printing plant, including paper
storage, pressroom, bindery and finishing areas. The system
included ten of ML’s high-capacity Princess 2 humidifiers,
equally divided between two zones. Humidity meters throughout the
zones are linked to a remote programmable controller that reads
results and controls the mist units.
Sutton explains, “Each zone has a set point at 45 percent
RH. If RH drops below that level, the PC starts the Princess units,
generating a cool, fine mist until the target RH is regained. The
difference was apparent right away. Static electricity ceased to be
a problem in a day or two. The paper feed problems, paper jams and
trip-offs just disappeared. So did the jogger problems, including
the paper jams and the haystacking. The bindery became more than 50
percent more efficient overnight.”
Issues related to paper shrinkage and curling also disappeared.
With paper now the right size and more pliable, there were no more
problems gripping the paper and none with printing or die
cutting.
Sutton says his ML system has lived up to all his expectations.
“It’s nice to have a system with capacity, consistency
and reliability. The integral fan and small droplets of the
Princess 2 units provide uniform coverage throughout.” He
says there have been few operating problems and only anticipated
routine maintenance has been required. And as expected, energy
costs have been about 70 percent lower than with the electric steam
system.
Cedar Graphics’ continued growth and resulting new equipment
(a new KBA Rapida 105 six-color sheetfed press and a KBA Rapida 105
10-color, 5/5 perfector) have meant pressroom expansion and the
need to expand the humidification system. Sutton says his first
stop in shopping for that expansion will be ML System and Husson
Inc.
For more information, see www.hussoninc.com.
Humidity—it’s all relative
Humidity is the amount of water vapor in the air. Relative humidity
(RH) is a phrase many use but few truly understand. RH refers to
the amount of water vapor actually in the air divided by the amount
of water vapor the air can hold. In the winter months, air
typically is drier (or less humid) and static charges tend to
build. To avoid these shocking developments in the pressroom and
bindery, consider some of the humidification and anti-static
options found in AMERICAN PRINTER’s October 2005 issue. In
“Beware of dry air” (pg. 44),
you’ll find products from American Moistening, Ionix
Technologies, DRAABE, Prisco, Simco, Takk, Meech Static
Eliminators, Tantec and more!